Blender guru donut how to#
Blender guru donut software#

And by the name itself, I’ve been tied to Blender, essentially.

Then, in 2008, I created a site called Blender Guru. And that was my motivation to pull me through, to learn it myself. But I told myself, if somebody else can teach themselves to create this car, then I can as well. And I downloaded it, opened it up, had no idea what I was doing, and there was very, very limited tutorials, because the community was a fraction at the time. A snapshot from Price’s real-time archviz tutorial.Īnd that was where I discovered Blender.

And so I searched, this was before Google, on MSN.com or something, “3D car,” and I found this image of a red sports car that was rendered, and it was hosted on a website called. And I was playing Need for Speed one night, and I was watching the car on the turntable, the select car screen, and I was like, oh man, I really want to make my own 3D car, that would be so cool, it’d feel like I’d own it, even though it’s virtual. And I was really into Need for Speed, those video games. I started in 2003, so I was 15 at the time. That’s entirely it – I was a poor high schooler. You can actually now draw in 3D, with Grease Pencil.ī&a: Why did you find yourself drawn to Blender originally?Īndrew Price: Because it was free. And there’s also a fully 2D animation pipeline. It was just little dots that you had to remember. Previously Blender was limited to 20 layers and there was no naming. So, for example, in making an architectural scene, I’m working on one right now, and you can model the room, add in countertops and model drawers, and do this all with the real-time engine turned on, so you can see the reflections, and the texturing, you can paint, and do all this with your final render.īlender also has a proper layer system now. It’s called Eevee, and it functions pretty similarly to Marmoset, Unreal Engine, or any kind of real-time engine, and the big advantage is that it’s – unlike Marmoset or Unreal – it’s built into a fully functioning 3D application. The second biggest thing is the real-time rendering engine. That’s probably the biggest thing that I think will really help Blender.

Blender guru donut how to#

It wasn’t good.īasically, there’s a guy there, William Reynish, who has spent the best part of probably about a year, figuring all this out, including how to keep the existing Blender users happy so that you can still use the shortcut method that people love, but then also introduce actual visible buttons that you can click on that behave the way people would expect.

It was kind of like they tried to slap an interface over the top of this hotkey system. There was a toolbar which had some words in it, but when you clicked it it didn’t function how you’d think. There was no indication really on how to do that if you didn’t know these hotkeys. If you want to rotate it, it’s R, if you want to scale it, it’s S, extruding is E, I is insert.

Blender guru donut software#

And it’s only now that there’s been a push to finally standardise and adopt typical conventions that other software has been using for a long time.Īnother example is Blender used to just be all about hotkeys, so, if you wanted to move an object you had to know that the hotkey was G. Having a non-standard mouse-click as select, it’s just always been that way. So not even unconventional in 3D space, unconventional in software space. It’s really good that you’re practicing a lot – it’s a complex tutorial and the more you explore and practice on your own the better what he’s teaching will stick in your memory so you can transfer the knowledge to making other objects.Previously, for example, Blender, up until 2.80, has had right-click as select. I like that Blender has so many ways to do things, even though that can be confusing at the start. It’s always good to know more than one way to do things because sometimes one way works better and sometimes another way, and different workflows feel better to different people. Snapping is more of a thing that you’ll end up using all the time when modeling, especially if you come from the technical side of things and like things to fit together just so. I like the shrinkwrapped one slightly better in this case, just from an artistic point of view, but you had a lot of control over the drips in the second case.Īnd yes, shrinkwrapping will work for many other situations. Looking good – that second icing is a lot thinner, and I imagine you can see situations where that’s a better solution.